A reader recently asked about the benefits of the rising bite and how it works. I thought that the answer may be of interest generally, hence, its posting here.
Hello D****l,
I appreciate the compliment but I think of myself as much more a student than an expert (there are enough "experts" in this field already).
The
rising bite (Rigby and Bissel's patent) is a so-called "third fastener"
in which a vertically-oriented bolt engages a horizontally-oriented,
"horseshoe" shaped rib extension. What this type of fastener provides,
that no other "third bite" does, is positive axial restraint of the breech.
Meaning, that it prevents the barrels and standing breech from moving
"fore and aft" (in opposite directions, due to breech thrust) during
firing.
Most break-action
designs only restrain the barrels in the vertical plane and, while this
keeps the barrels from pivoting open during firing, it also allows the
standing breech to deflect axially, since this axial deflection is
resisted only by the mass and strength of the material at the juncture
of the standing breech and the frame flats. This is the reason that double rifles usually exhibit "bolsters" of added material at this juncture. Unfortunately, many of these bolsters are little more than ornamental by design.
Here is an example of the value of those bolsters, in a design that is only underbolted and fit "on the circle":
Many
third bites, such as Purdey's and Holland& Holland's hidden third
bites, also allow this deflection to occur due to the fact that these "hidden bites" also act to restrain the barrels only in the vertical plane. The so-called "doll's head" rib
extensions are supposed to prevent this axial deflection but, with the
exception of Westley Richard's bolted doll's head, all fail in this
regard. It must be noted here that Westley Richard's bolted doll's head was their primary (and only) fastener for quite some time and they later added the underbolt in order to make the gun have three bites, so WR's doll's head is not technically a "third bite". The Greener-type crossbolt has the potential to prevent this
axial movement but only if fitted properly, which most are not. In
fact, in most guns (other than Greeners) that employ this type of third
bite, the bolt makes little, if any, contact with the rib extension.
The
rising bite demands appreciable skill in its fitting during
manufacture. The underbolt and the vertical bolt must fully engage
their bites when closed, and the linkage that connects them must be
designed so that both bolts clear their respective bites at the same
time, in order to allow the barrels to open, while also translating the underbolt's horizontal movement to vertical movement of the rising bolt. The added time in design
and manufacture obviously adds to the cost, and this is probably the
primary reason that it's not seen more often.
All
of the above applies to single-barrel and side-by-side guns, whose
frames are inherently quite flexible. Over/unders (especially a
Boss-type) are a bit of a different story since their frames are much
stiffer (more resistant to deflection), due to their frame height and
the deep sides of the frame acting as shear webs. The rising bite in
the Boss guns is a very technically interesting design but, owing to the
frame's inherent stiffness, it is little more than technical curiosa.
The
over/under's inherent stiffness in the vertical plane, not only in the
frame but also in the barrels, is one of the reasons that the O/U is
technically superior to the SxS.
I hope this helps. If you have any further questions, feel free to ask.
Dewey
No comments:
Post a Comment