These guys hunt quarry that actually shoots back and they do it in defense of those that can not defend themselves. This is conservation, not the twisted idea that "legally" killing endangered animals somehow helps them. Even more twisted is the "logic" that an animal must have an economic value attached to it to be worthy of saving. The fact (baffling though it is) that certain (in fact, useless to humans) parts of these animals' anatomy have an economic value is the very reason for the poaching. I've heard all of the self-ennobling bullshit stories about how hunting "fees" help the community and how the meat from the slaughtered animals feeds the people who otherwise would have none, yadda, yadda. The fact is that trophy hunters would still kill the animal whether the meat went to use or not, and those "fees" mostly go to line the pockets of corrupt officials. I have no issue with the ethical hunting of non-endangered species but I find little ethical about trophy hunting species that are critically endangered and intelligent. The idea of looking upon a great bull elephant and thinking "What a magnificent creature, I must kill it" is as incomprehensible to me as it is indefensible.
Behold the faces of true bravery, men who clearly are able to appreciate majesty without wanting to either kill it or possess it.
http://www.latimes.com/world/la-fg-environmental-activists-congo-20171222-htmlstory.html
Thanks for sharing the article and your opinions. Good to read both.
ReplyDeleteGregg
www.DogsandDoubles.com